by beachgirl » 22 Dec 2011, 22:40
Hi wecc, and thank you for your thoughtful reply! Are you referring to Dr. Sohn's clinic in NYC? Anyway I would LOVE to avoid LIS if I can; but I'm concerned that there are so few CRS or gastroenterologists doing standardized AD in the US. I would think insurance carriers would love to cover AD if the cost is lower (including the cost of surgical sequellae); and large employers (who are paying the cost of insurance) would love to get their employees back on the job as quickly as possible. In fact, the ACRS textbook does cite some decent studies of standardized AD and even seems rather complementary but (not surprisingly) come down in favor of properly done LIS anyway.
In fact, UpToDate, a peer-reviewed medical textbook (very highly regarded by physicians) just published a general surgery text which (though directed to surgeons) comprehensively reviewed non-surgical and surgical treatments. They seem to have misunderstood AD (most of the material was about the Lord Procedure and the rest of their discussion of AD seems to have missed the point). To me this widespread lack of intelligent, evidence-based discussion of standardized AD is noteworthy. But maybe my point of view is US-centric. Maybe there are good, peer-reviewed evidence based studies, and much more experience, outside the US and would appreciate knowing about that as I have a good friend who is a medical informaticist and specializes in evaluating the quality of evidence behind studies.
Anyway thanks again for your insights and thoughts... and much gratitude for this Forum!! Your posts of AD led me to study this route in the first place, and I thank you for that. I am still open minded.
One more thing: my CRS does micro-banding for hemmies, which is far cheaper than hemmeroidectomies. And less painful. Painless, practically! The recovery time is a few days, too! Not painful months and months. That's how I met her.
So I don't think all doctors are just in it for the bucks, even though you do make an excellent point (translated: when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!) Ie people, including doctors, do what they are trained to do. But if there was money to be made in healing AF's another way, a better way, and good data to back it, I think some doctors would go for this route and make a fortune! and skip the surgery.
So... let's bring on the data.
I think there is just a huge risk in doing something not well studied just because the alternative isn't great. So... studies, anyone?