Hello all,
I've been lurking about this forum for the past month or so. I've been planning to let out a good old fashioned super-rant about the experience I've had for the past year and a half with my fissure. I might still do that (with all the glorious details and profanity that comes with such a thing), but for right now, I've got a judgement call to make.
For almost a year now, I've been on diltiazem cream, which has done... pretty much nothing, as far as I can tell, other than possibly taking a bit of the edge off bathroom discomfort. According to my latest CRS (this was number three, and possibly the least confidence-inspiring one, and most definitely the most painful one), he couldn't even FIND a fissure... which seemed strange because I can find the pile (skin tag) with a small mirror and this guy had an analscope... a really PAINFUL analscope. But, I suppose that could also speak to some unseen effectiveness of the diltiazem.
That doctor suggested a ridiculous idea, which was to put me under general anesthetic so he could get a better look and possibly do the botox thing. I agreed at first... and then realized that that would cost me more than I make in three months (yay America). So, between that, his unprofessionalism, his lack of knowledge, and the wonderful "audience" he invited to my anal examination without my consent (three people in total), I was filled with a refreshed determination to take care of this on my own, by any means necessary, since the doctors clearly aren't on my side.
I've been looking into a few medical journals, postings on this forum, and any other place I can get information and I quickly came across glyceryl trinitrate, or nitroglycerin, as one of the main treatments for this condition, MUCH more common than diltiazem. So why didn't my doctors even mention it as a pre-surgery option? Chalk that up to another reason I no longer trust them. Fortunately, I have a GP who's basically a walking prescription pad, and he's willing to write me up a prescription.
Now, as for my question, from the looks of it, both of these ointments are vasodilators, meaning they both work on the same theory that muscle relaxation can promote healing. Has anyone had any experience with both of these medications and how they compare to each other beyond that? Am I right in thinking nitro is a bit more "heavy duty"? I'm planning to try it, but as many people have noted on this forum, the only brand name nitro ointment in the US is Rectiv, which costs slightly less than a month of rent (i.e. not cheap). There's the whole "$40 for the first try" deal (you might remember this tactic from other medical professionals, such as cocaine dealers!) for a 30g tube. How long does 30g last? Would it be enough to at least see if it works? Also, can anyone speak on the comparison between Rective (0.4% nitro) and pharmacy compound ointment (0.2% nitro)? I haven't found the exact cost of the compound, but my doctor seems to think it'd be a lot more affordable, which is great, but... why fight something with a slingshot when you could have a nuclear bomb?
Any feedback would be appreciated. Like I said, I've had it with the medical world, so I need all the help I can get from the only people trustworthy in a situation like this: the people who know how I feel.
Edit: Found some more Diltiazem/nitro posts, so sorry for the repeat posting. Nevertheless, would still love some input, and it was nice to talk it out a little too!