by buttmachine » 29 May 2009, 09:29
Just got back from the doctor's this morning -- first checkup in six weeks. He says I'm still not completely healed, and he's concerned about it -- that something more serious, like an abscess, is not likely to happen but could happen.
Meanwhile, on my end, I feel absolutely fine. I have no pain, no spasms, no bleeding, and I've gone back to riding my bicycle as of a few weeks ago. So I'm a little puzzled as to what he's seeing that I'm not feeling, but then again I never had a very painful fissure to begin with.
He's given me three options at this point:
1. Let him thoroughly examine me under general in the OR, or local in his office, and more than likely lay the incision open to make it finally heal properly.
2. Have a new colleague of his, who just joined the practice and is a CRS (mine is a general surgeon) examine me and see what he thinks.
3. Do nothing, come back in 8 weeks, and then choose #1 or #2.
I was noncommittal and didn't even make a follow-up appointment. My every instinct is telling me to just leave it alone and not even go back in 8 weeks, unless I suddenly develop pain or some kind of infection. I don't have a problem being examined by another doctor (though my examinations by this one are not exactly pleasant). But the idea of going under the knife again -- when the surgeon may have been a little over-aggressive last time by doing a fissurectomy that still hasn't completely healed -- and going through that recovery process yet again, seems INSANE to me.
Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks.