LIS (Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy) is actually considered the gold standard surgery for treating Chronic Anal Fissures. As far as science knows, an acute fissure becomes chronic due to the injured muscle (internal sphincter) entering into a state of continuous spasms and contraction, creating an ischemia that doesn't allow enough blood to flow to the site, hence impeding healing.LIS weakens a tiny part of the internal sphincter muscle by cutting some of the fibers, lowering the internal sphincter tone, which finally allows healing.The thing is, an ischemic wound usually presents these features;
- Gangrenous and death tissue.
- Doesn't easily bleed.
- Has no evidences of healing.
...But a CAF's features actually don't match those criteria because;
- Non gangrenous but healthy tissue.
- Bleeds quite easily, for some patients even daily and even in moderate amount.
- Presents evidences of healing by showing overgrowth of healing tissue ( Sentinel Pile - Hypertrophic scar)
...So my question is, is it really the lack of blood flow to the site the culprit behind an anal fissure becoming chronic?LIS works very well but presents some serious risks as incontinence, especially in women.Shouldn't we be looking elsewhere to find the solution?As far as I can understand a Chronic Anal Fissure doesn't classify as an ischemic wound, so why is medicine treating it like one?