I agree. Like I said, I am not advocating the constant use of laxatives, neither the emolient like colace and mineral oil, nor the osmotic like MOM or propolene glycol. What I am suggesting is that occasional (sometimes for weeks at a time) use of these during periods of constipation has been very helpful to me in dealing with my fissure/hard poo problem, especialy during times when I am feeling constipated and especially after I have reinjured myself.
Still, I do think that I need to explain myself futher, as I don't take my health lightly at all, and I do rather exhaustive research when thinking about possible remedies to my situation, and I thought it might be valuable to share some of the conclusions that I came to regarding how to solve the tough hard poo problem for myself when remedies like more fiber and water don't seem to be working.
After reading through several medical jounrals, including NJM and BMJ, and here is what I found regarding mineral oil:
Lipoid pnemonia occurs only if one breathes in the mineral oil. That is why it shouild not be given to animals and children that are too young to be able to eat properly.
The popularity of liquid paraffin as a treatment for constipation and encopresis stems primarily from its tolerability and ease of titration. Although conversion of mineral oil to hydroxy fatty acids induces an osmotic effect, liquid paraffin appears to work primarily as a stool lubricant. Therefore, liquid paraffin is not associated with abdominal cramps, diarrhoea, flatulence, electrolyte disturbances, or the emergence of tolerance with long term usage, side effects commonly associated with osmotic or stimulant laxatives. These features make liquid paraffin particularly attractive for use in chronic constipation and encopresis of childhood, where large doses and prolonged administration commonly are necessary during the disimpaction and maintenance phases of treatment, respectively.
For the purposes of disimpaction, liquid paraffin appeared to be slightly less efficacious than an oral lavage [i.e. enema] solution in a small randomised study by Tolia and colleagues. However, liquid paraffin was better tolerated and compliance was improved compared with the polyethylene glycol solution.
The widely held belief that fat soluble vitamin absorption may be affected by ingestion of liquid paraffin is based on early studies. In 1939 Curtis and Ballmer showed a slight decrease in serum carotene values after a number of weeks of liquid paraffin use. However, concentrations of carotene in the deficient range were not observed in this study.....In contrast, Ballantine and colleagues, in a study of prothrombin time, serum retinol, and

tocopherol concentrations, did not find any significant difference in values among 19 children receiving liquid paraffin compared with a group of control patients. Some of these children had received liquid paraffin for as long as six years....Clark and colleagues, using sequential measurements of fat soluble vitamin markers, showed that up to four months of liquid paraffin treatment does not adversely affect concentrations of retinol or

tocopherol. In a more recent study, McClung and colleagues showed stable serum concentrations of vitamin E among 16 children taking liquid paraffin over a period of six months. Taken together these data clearly indicate that liquid paraffin therapy is inadequate to deplete tissue stores of fat soluble vitamins.
One article that summarizes everything nicely is
http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/85/2/121.
Last edited by Anonymous on 10 Jul 2007, 11:27, edited 1 time in total.